Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/93196
Export to Endnote
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-04T23:24:05Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.govdocCR2017-0547-
dc.identifier.urihttps://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/93196-
dc.description.abstractDuring the 2016-17 term, LCR undertook a review of the short-wave infrared (SWIR) scan data of drill core and developed an exploration plan based on the current results of the mineral systems review. The minerals system review incorporates influencing factors on mineralised deposition and has been used successfully by Canadian explorers in the Athabascan Uranium Province. The mineral systems approach brings together the various aspects of structural architecture, sedimentology, fluid sources and pathways from regional to prospect scale. The mineral systems approach/study has incorporated solid geology interpretation, sedimentological analysis, multi-element geochemistry analysis, SWIR spectral data collection and assay of drill core and rock chips, including a total of 5,359 spectra samples taken from 39 drill holes sourced from EL 23573. Analysis of the SWIR scanning of the drill core shows common minerals to be chlorite, dickite, dolomite, kaolinite, montmorillonite, sericite, sericitic-chlorite and sericitic-kaolinite. Areas which have encountered mafic volcanics generally display a mix of chlorite, sericitic-chlorite, montmorillonite, kaolinite and sericitic-kaolinite. The sandstones generally only show a sericitic composition. Varying sericitic and chlorite wavelengths are present throughout drill holes. There are occasionally spikes, however, it is unclear what these are related to. There are sometimes larger spikes in sericite and chlorite wavelengths with uranium mineralisation, however, in order to determine a pattern to the wavelength magnitude, additional sampling and scanning of unmineralised 'background' rock is required. Following this, it is considered statistical analysis would further determine a relationship between mineralisation and mineralogy.-
dc.subject.classificationUranium-
dc.subject.classificationPrecious metals-
dc.subject.classificationGold-
dc.subject.classificationNative title-
dc.subject.classificationAboriginal sacred sites-
dc.subject.classificationGeological setting-
dc.subject.classificationRegional geology-
dc.subject.classificationLocal geology-
dc.subject.classificationMineralisation-
dc.subject.classificationPrevious exploration-
dc.subject.classificationLithology-
dc.subject.classificationReviews-
dc.titleLagoon Creek Project EL 23573 Annual Report for period ending 22 December 2017-
dc.relation.isatmap100Seigal 6462-
dc.relation.isatmap250Calvert Hills SE5308-
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceMcArthur Basin-
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceMurphy Inlier-
dc.description.stratnameBillicumidji Rhyolite Member-
dc.description.stratnameCliffdale Volcanics-
dc.description.stratnameWestmoreland Conglomerate-
dc.description.stratnameSeigal Volcanics-
dc.description.stratnameMullaman beds-
dc.identifier.tenureEL23573-
dc.description.modifyhistory16/01/2018-
dc.description.modifyhistory16/10/2024-
dc.contributor.holderLagoon Creek Resources-
dc.identifier.collectionnameMinerals Exploration Reports (MEX)
dc.identifier.govdocprefixCR2017
local.flag.notified1en
Appears in Collections:Minerals Exploration Reports (MEX)

Files in this Report:
File SizeFormat Add to
Download
EL23573_2017_A.pdf5.61 MBPDF Add


Items in GEMIS are protected by copyright unless otherwise indicated.

Get Adobe Reader