Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Export to Endnote
https://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/83279
Export to Endnote
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Boots, MK | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-09-19T00:45:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.govdoc | CR2003-0314 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/83279 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A proposal to undertake a regional airborne EM survey to be part of a follow-up programme of the Mount Fitch South prospect was abandoned when suitable joint venture funding could not be concluded. As part of this plan, the previous ground EM was modelled to determine the effectiveness of alternate methods. This work concluded that the fixed wing Tempest method would suitable. The report on this modelling is appended. All existing exploration and drill data was re-evaluated from the Mount Fitch area, to establish why previous intense uranium exploration programmes had failed to locate the Mount Fitch South mineralisation. It was concluded that intense leaching had occurred in the oxide zone of the mineralisation, and as such, only subtle geochemical anomalism occurs in RAB or aircore holes drilled in this zone. Three follow up drill holes were planned to further evaluate the Mount Fitch South prospect, however these were deferred to early in the 2004 field season. As part of this planning some grid rehabilitation was undertaken, and the location of the ground EM conductor was flagged. Existing drill data in the vicinity of the prospect was entered into a database to allow further investigation to be undertaken should new drill results prove positive. | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Magnesite | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Base metals | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Regional geology | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | General geology | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Exploration history | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Geological interpretation | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Database validation | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Geophysical interpretation | en_US |
dc.title | Annual report of exploration ERL 125 Mt Fitch for the year ending 22 August 2003 | en_US |
dc.relation.isatmap100 | Bynoe 5072 | en_US |
dc.relation.isatmap100 | McKinlay River 5271 | en_US |
dc.relation.isatmap250 | Darwin SD5204 | en_US |
dc.relation.isatmap250 | Pine Creek SD5208 | en_US |
dc.relation.isatgeolprovince | Pine Creek Orogen | en_US |
dc.description.stratname | Crater Formation, Coomalie Dolomite, Whites Formation | en_US |
dc.description.mineprospectname | Mount Fitch | en_US |
dc.description.mineprospectname | Blueys Magnesite | en_US |
dc.identifier.tenure | ERL125 | en_US |
dc.description.modifyhistory | 07/02/2005 | en_US |
dc.description.modifyhistory | 29/08/2016 | en_US |
dc.contributor.holder | Compass Resources | en_US |
dc.identifier.collectionname | Minerals Exploration Reports (MEX) | en_US |
dc.identifier.govdocprefix | CR2003 | en_US |
local.flag.notified | 1 | |
Appears in Collections: | Minerals Exploration Reports (MEX) |
Files in this Report:
File | Size | Format | Add to Download |
---|---|---|---|
Appendix2_ERL125_drill_location.xls | 53.5 kB | Microsoft Excel | Add |
Appendix3_ERL125_assays_09.2003.xls | 524.5 kB | Microsoft Excel | Add |
ERL125_2003_A.pdf | 255.07 kB | Add |
Items in GEMIS are protected by copyright unless otherwise indicated.