Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/83068
Export to Endnote
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFinn, Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-29T06:22:16Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.govdocCR2014-1053en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/83068en_US
dc.description.abstractThe 2014 work program consisted of a first-pass RC program in September (19th-26th). 49 holes were drilled totalling 771m. The hole spacing varied between 25m and 100m and only prospective samples were submitted for analysis. Each sample consisted of a 1m interval. The drilling at Battle Creek 1 revealed no significant manganese mineralisation with the highest manganese value being 2.78 percent Mn in 1m at 18m depth. The drilling at Battle Creek 2 revealed manganese mineralisation in 24 of the 35 holes drilled with the highest value of 17.92 percent Mn in a 1m sample at 6m. Of the 279 samples from Battle Creek 2, 32 percent returned values over 2 percent Mn and 6 percent over 3 percent Mn. Several other drill holes reported values over 4 percent Mn. Any sample returning a value of 2 percent Mn or greater is considered of interest. The total length of the mineralised unit is 1.3km with an approximate average thickness of 8m. The mineralisation is near surface (0-10m) and flat lying which would allow for conventional strip-mining. This first-pass drill program clearly showed that the mineralisation at Battle Creek 2 extends for a significant distance (greater than 1km) and can reach grades greater than 5 percent Mn and as high as 17.92 percent Mn. With the large size of the prospective area the prospect remains viable if additional areas of elevated manganese can be identified. The beneficiation test-work from 2012 has shown that the manganese can be upgraded from 5.2 percent to 30.9 percent Mn with minimal work, therefore Battle Creek 2 can assume a low cut-off grade compared to other deposits. Additional drilling and beneficiation test-work is recommended to further evaluate the prospectivity of the prospect. Reconnaissance investigation is also recommended to identify additional outcropping mineralisation.en_US
dc.subject.classificationManganeseen_US
dc.subject.classificationDrillingen_US
dc.subject.classificationRC drillingen_US
dc.subject.classificationDrill hole logsen_US
dc.subject.classificationDrill hole dataen_US
dc.subject.classificationDrill cuttings samplingen_US
dc.subject.classificationAssayingen_US
dc.subject.classificationAssay valueen_US
dc.titleGroup exploration report for the period 23 December 2013 to 22 December 2014 for GR230, Victoria River Projecten_US
dc.relation.isatmap100Victoria River Downs 5165en_US
dc.relation.isatmap100Mount Sanford 5064en_US
dc.relation.isatmap250Victoria River Downs SE5204en_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceKalkarindji Provinceen_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceBirrindudu Basinen_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceVictoria Basinen_US
dc.description.stratnameBattle Creek Formation, Antrim Plateau Volcanicsen_US
dc.description.geochemicalsampling359 Drill samplesen_US
dc.description.drilling49 RC holes 771 m (USIV001 to USIV049)en_US
dc.description.mineprospectnameBattle Creek 1en_US
dc.description.mineprospectnameBattle Creek 2en_US
dc.identifier.tenureEL27437en_US
dc.identifier.tenureEL29453en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory13/03/2015en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory19/09/2017en_US
dc.contributor.holderUniversal Splendour Investmentsen_US
dc.identifier.collectionnameMinerals Exploration Reports (MEX)en_US
dc.identifier.govdocprefixCR2014en_US
local.flag.notified1
Appears in Collections:Minerals Exploration Reports (MEX)

Files in this Report:
File SizeFormat Add to
Download
GR230_2014_GA_01.pdf13.72 MBPDF Add
GR230_2014_GA_02_NTSL4_COLL2014A.txt5.03 kBText Add
GR230_2014_GA_03_NTDL4_GEO2014A.txt9.01 kBText Add
GR230_2014_GA_04_NTDG4_ASS2014A.txt97.41 kBText Add


Items in GEMIS are protected by copyright unless otherwise indicated.

Get Adobe Reader