Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/75858
Export to Endnote
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoyle, Nen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-28T04:33:59Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.govdocCR2010-0410en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/75858en_US
dc.description.abstractDuring the fourth year of tenure, one diamond drill hole was completed on the floodplains at Woolner station for 164.9m. No mineralisation was encountered. The diamond drill hole was targeting magnetic Palaeoproterozic metasediments on the western flank of the Woolner Dome granite.Only one hole out of the two proposed was drilled due to excessive time spent working out how to drill the first hole and the onset of wet season storms which was starting to limit access. 3D modelling of the magnetic data completed by Matthew Hutchens from AsIs International was used to help define the location, azimuth and dip of the diamond drill hole. The diamond drill hole was drilled via the mud-rotary method until basement was reached at a depth of 68.8m. The first 45m contained wet grey floodplain mud then Cretaceous sand and clay from 45-68.8m. The Woolner floodplain had not been diamond drilled since 1972 and it took drillers H20 Limited from Coolalinga about 7 days to work out how to drill the first 68.8m. The best method to drill the overburden was using a blade bit with large annulus, slow rotation and penetration and very heavy use of mud. Slower drilling worked best so that small pieces of clay could be washed back up the annulus without clogging it and stopping water return. Water carting was a big problem (very slow trips using small trucks) because the floodplain could not handle bigger water trucks and the track was very rough. Once basement was reached, diamond drilling was relatively straight forward. HQ rods with a shoe bit were drilled into basement, then NQ rods were run and diamond drilling commenced. Quarter core was submitted to AMDEL laboratories in Adelaide for assay. Results are not encouraging at all.en_US
dc.subject.classificationUranium explorationen_US
dc.subject.classificationBase metal explorationen_US
dc.subject.classificationDiamond drillingen_US
dc.titleFourth annual report for EL 24939 Woolner period ended 10 July 2010en_US
dc.relation.isatmap100Mary River 5272en_US
dc.relation.isatmap100Point Stuart 5273en_US
dc.relation.isatmap100Noonamah 5172en_US
dc.relation.isatmap100Koolpinyah 5173en_US
dc.relation.isatmap250Darwin SD5204en_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovincePine Creek Orogenen_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceMoney Shoal Basinen_US
dc.description.geochemicalsamplingdowhole assays of selected samplesen_US
dc.description.drilling1 Diamond hole for 164.9 m (WODDH1)en_US
dc.description.mineprospectnameDora Creeken_US
dc.description.mineprospectnameAnomaly 18en_US
dc.identifier.tenureEL24939en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory06/08/2010en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory19/01/2012en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory07/06/2013en_US
dc.contributor.holderRum Jungle Uraniumen_US
dc.identifier.collectionnameMinerals Exploration Reports (MEX)en_US
dc.identifier.govdocprefixCR2010en_US
local.flag.notified1
Appears in Collections:Minerals Exploration Reports (MEX)

Files in this Report:
File SizeFormat Add to
Download
EL24939_2010_A_01.pdf9.9 MBPDF Add
EL24939_2010_A_02_Appendix1.xls28 kBMicrosoft Excel Add
EL24939_2010_A_03_Appendix2.xlsx10.67 kBMicrosoft Excel XML Add


Items in GEMIS are protected by copyright unless otherwise indicated.

Get Adobe Reader