Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/63568
Export to Endnote
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBichan, HRen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-23T08:18:36Z-
dc.date.issued1971en_US
dc.identifier.govdocCR1971-0056en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/63568en_US
dc.description.abstractDuring the authors' recent visit, Areas 1, 4, 5 and 6, were briefly examined. A limited number of stream sediment samples were collected for assay to indicate the general level of metal values to be expected within the area. Experience has shown that for regional geochemical work, the minus 80 mesh fraction of stream sediment is generally suitable for exploration assays. No difficulty was found in the field in collecting samples with sufficient minus 80 mesh material for assay. Twenty samples were collected, sieved at minus 80 mesh, and the fine fraction analysed by geochemical, atomic absorption techniques for copper, cobalt, nickel, manganese, zinc, lead, silver and arsenic.en_US
dc.description.abstractThese results suggest that there is little significant variation in background values in sediments derived from streams draining the various lithological units. This should considerably simplify the interpretation of analytical data derived from a full geochemical exploration programme. Although present data is somewhat inadequate, it would appear that the mean background values for some of the metals will be approximately as follows: Nickel 10 ppm, Copper 15 ppm, Zinc 20 ppm, Lead 20 ppm, Cobalt 10 ppm. Silver and arsenic values would appear to be uniformly low while insufficient manganese values are available, in view of the wide range of results (60 ppm to 700 ppm), to allow meaningful comment at this time. a) The reconnaissance visit has broadly confirmed the structure and stratigraphy of the area as outlined in our previous reports. b) The various possibilities of mineralisation as outlined in our previous reports continue to be valid. c) The analytical data suggests that background metal values for each of a number of elements in stream sediments derived from the various lithological units are comparable.en_US
dc.subject.classificationBase metalsen_US
dc.subject.classificationCobalten_US
dc.subject.classificationCopper explorationen_US
dc.subject.classificationNickelen_US
dc.subject.classificationManganeseen_US
dc.subject.classificationArsenicen_US
dc.subject.classificationStream sediment samplingen_US
dc.subject.classificationGeological interpretationen_US
dc.title1971 Report on reconnaissance trip to AP 2694 Victoria River Basin.en_US
dc.relation.isatmap100Millik Monmir 4967en_US
dc.relation.isatmap100Victoria River 4867en_US
dc.relation.isatmap250Auvergne SD5215en_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceVictoria-Birrindudu Basinen_US
dc.description.stratnameAuvergne Groupen_US
dc.description.stratnameBullita Groupen_US
dc.description.geochemicalsampling20 stream sediment samples collected and assayed for copper, cobalt, nickel, manganese, zinc, lead, silver and arsenic.en_US
dc.identifier.tenureAP2694en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory02/10/2003en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory29/07/2009en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory12/09/2016en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory03/11/2021en_US
dc.contributor.holderNorth Coast Miningen_US
dc.identifier.collectionnameMinerals Exploration Reports (MEX)en_US
dc.identifier.govdocprefixCR1971en_US
local.flag.notified1
Appears in Collections:Minerals Exploration Reports (MEX)

Files in this Report:
File SizeFormat Add to
Download
CR19710056.pdf1.03 MBPDF Add


Items in GEMIS are protected by copyright unless otherwise indicated.

Get Adobe Reader