Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/61178
Export to Endnote
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-23T05:17:34Z-
dc.date.issued1984en_US
dc.identifier.govdocCR1984-0190en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://geoscience.nt.gov.au/gemis/ntgsjspui/handle/1/61178en_US
dc.description.abstractEL 3059 was considered to possess a favourable geological setting to host uranium mineralisation. Exploration activities to locate such mineralisation were restricted due to limited access to the areas of interest and the thickness of cover. Emphasis shifted to an evaluation of lime sand and shell grit deposits associated with the coastal dunes and accumulations up to 10 km inland. The study included detailed photogeological mapping of sand ridges, a literature review relating to sand grit deposits of Chambers Bay, geological traverses, the collection of bulk samples for chemical analysis and preliminary resource estimation. Five bulk samples of coast deposits and from Sampan Creek were assayed at the Department of Mines and Energy. After riffling, samples were subject to dry and wet screening tests. The coarser the material, the the higher the CaCO3 content and lower SiO2. The average grade of the five samples varies between 62% to 78% CaCO3 with negligible MgCO3, Fe2O3 and Al2O3. The SiO2 content varies between 21.2% to 24.8%. The high SiO2 could be dealt with by washing. The split at 500 microns recovers 64% of the total CaCO3 at an average grade of 91.77% CaCO3 and 5.68% SiO2. Additional tests are recommended.en_US
dc.subject.classificationUraniumen_US
dc.subject.classificationLimeen_US
dc.subject.classificationShell griten_US
dc.subject.classificationCoastal dunesen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhotogeological mapsen_US
dc.subject.classificationLandsaten_US
dc.subject.classificationLiterature reviewsen_US
dc.subject.classificationGeological traversesen_US
dc.subject.classificationGeological interpretationen_US
dc.subject.classificationBulk samplingen_US
dc.subject.classificationBeach sandsen_US
dc.subject.classificationGeochemical dataen_US
dc.subject.classificationGeochemical interpretationen_US
dc.subject.classificationResource assessmenten_US
dc.subject.classificationLime cementsen_US
dc.subject.classificationLimestoneen_US
dc.titleAnnual Report on EL 3059 Point Stuart, period ending 12-9-83-12-9-84.en_US
dc.relation.isatmap100Point Stuart 5273en_US
dc.relation.isatmap250Darwin SD5204en_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovincePine Creek Orogenen_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceArafura Basinen_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceCenozoic sedimentsen_US
dc.relation.isatgeolprovinceMoney Shoal Basinen_US
dc.description.stratnameWildman Siltstoneen_US
dc.description.stratnameMundogie Sandstoneen_US
dc.description.stratnameMasson Formationen_US
dc.description.stratnameMount Hooper Sandstoneen_US
dc.description.stratnameKoolpin Formationen_US
dc.description.geochemicalsampling5 bulk samplesen_US
dc.description.mineprospectnamePoint Stuarten_US
dc.identifier.tenureEL3059en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory06/09/2004en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory02/10/2003en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory18/05/2005en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory15/01/2007en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory24/01/2007en_US
dc.description.modifyhistory17/09/2015en_US
dc.contributor.holderAGIP Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.collectionnameMinerals Exploration Reports (MEX)en_US
dc.identifier.govdocprefixCR1984en_US
local.flag.notified1
Appears in Collections:Minerals Exploration Reports (MEX)

Files in this Report:
File SizeFormat Add to
Download
CR19840190.pdf1.14 MBPDF Add


Items in GEMIS are protected by copyright unless otherwise indicated.

Get Adobe Reader